Talk:The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

26 April 2025

24 April 2025

19 April 2025

17 April 2025

16 April 2025

14 April 2025

13 April 2025

10 April 2025

9 April 2025

8 April 2025

  • curprev 15:1115:11, 8 April 2025 Godtone talk contribs m 7,008 bytes +1,571 clarify purpose of the post as the title and address the only other genuine issue that im aware of that i forgot to address (but which for reasons explained i dont think is actually much of an issue)
  • curprev 14:4014:40, 8 April 2025 Godtone talk contribs 5,437 bytes +3,701 defence of gene's derivation as the best one imo so that it deserves inclusion on the main page, and perhaps some mathematical motivations/details that might not be obvious to the reader could be added to make it more accessible

5 April 2025

  • curprev 18:0218:02, 5 April 2025 Sintel talk contribs 1,736 bytes +35 No edit summary
  • curprev 18:0118:01, 5 April 2025 Sintel talk contribs 1,701 bytes +1,701 Created page with "== Review needed == This page is linked from almost every important edo, and I would consider it "high priority". Despite the length of the page and numerous derivations, some questions and problems remain: * The construction itself remains largely unmotivated. Why the specific error functions? There is a large amount of handwaving and heuristics. We can use different cyclic error functions which will not lead to zeta, but they seem equally valid. If there is no specif..."