User talk:FloraC/Archive 2023
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Equivalence continua: fractional n's
How exactly do you get a rational number from using a fractional exponent? This is mostly for the diaschismic-porcupine continuum page I'm making.
--Royalmilktea (talk) 02:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- You can get the fractional monzos by adding or subtracting fractional multiples of the n = infinity monzo from the n = 0 3-limit base monzo, and then eliminate fractions by lcm-ing it. Btw I have some important comments and plz make sure you read the talk page of that particular page you mentioned. FloraC (talk) 09:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Constrained tuning vs. POTE tuning
I wondered that optimal tunings of some temperaments are indicated by constrained TE (CTE) instead of octave-destretched TE (POTE). Why did you update to replace generators POTE to CTE?
Temperament generators indicated by CTE tuning:
and so on ... --Xenllium (talk) 08:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- The community (at least the part from Discord) have generally agreed that CTE is a more logical tuning. It's planned that most of the RTT pages will be eventually updated to CTE. FloraC (talk) 10:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Temperament name revision for 99&166 and 166&198
Reviewing magic in Encyclopedia of Microtonal Music Theory, Tonalsoft, a low-accuacy temperament which tempers out 36/35 and 1875/1792 is given a name witch, so I revised the temperament names for 99&166 (witch → witcher) and 166&198 (semiwitch→semiwitcher). Deal? --Xenllium (talk) 07:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)