Template talk:Interval table

Moving tables >200 to their own separate pages instead of keeping them in the main edo page

I have noticed that, when used on pages for edos 200 or bigger, Template:Interval table noticeably slows the page’s loading time.

Currently, the pages of this size which are using it, are:

• 238edo
• 240edo
• 276edo
• 302edo
• 311edo
• 321edo
• 360edo
• 365edo
• 400edo
• 636edo

For each of these pages, I’m wondering if I should move the interval table out into its own separate page (e.g. “Table of 238edo intervals”) in order to reduce the loading time of the main edo pages themselves?

Does this sound like a good idea?

--BudjarnLambeth (talk) 10:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Imo all edo pages in the hundreds should have their interval table relegated to a separate subpage. This template is a good makeshift but it should eventually be replaced with manually created tables by someone who's actually interested in using the edos. FloraC (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)