Talk:Direct approximation: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
I believe what the author may be trying to do in this sentence is to contrast the patent-val-mapped interval with the "directly-mapped interval". But this might suggest the existence of a "direct val". So I suggest referring to it as the "direct approximation", since this implies that it does not go via the intermediary of any prime mapping or val. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:35, 28 June 2021 (UTC) | I believe what the author may be trying to do in this sentence is to contrast the patent-val-mapped interval with the "directly-mapped interval". But this might suggest the existence of a "direct val". So I suggest referring to it as the "direct approximation", since this implies that it does not go via the intermediary of any prime mapping or val. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:35, 28 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
: The best approximation of prime intervals specifically establishes the patent val for and EDO. However, the best approximation of other intervals is not necessarily identical with the mapping established by the patent val. Does that make sense? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC) | |||