Talk:Map: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
re |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we get a note clarifying that this is the terminology being used in Douglas's system, rather than in standard RTT, in particular elsewhere on this Wiki? Also, can we add a category to these pages which are part of Douglas's system and which use this alternate terminology? | Can we get a note clarifying that this is the terminology being used in Douglas's system, rather than in standard RTT, in particular elsewhere on this Wiki? Also, can we add a category to these pages which are part of Douglas's system and which use this alternate terminology? [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 02:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
: (The above comment was from Mike, he just forgot to sign it) Mike If it would be convenient for you, I don't have a problem with it if you want to create a category on the wiki and add it to all pages I've contributed to. Again, I list the contributions that I care most about [[Douglas_Blumeyer#Some_of_his_work_here_on_the_wiki|on my user page]], so that could be a quick reference for you. | : (The above comment was from Mike, he just forgot to sign it) Mike If it would be convenient for you, I don't have a problem with it if you want to create a category on the wiki and add it to all pages I've contributed to. Again, I list the contributions that I care most about [[Douglas_Blumeyer#Some_of_his_work_here_on_the_wiki|on my user page]], so that could be a quick reference for you. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: To Mike: I disagree on this. I believe Douglas and I both share the sense that we only want to maintain one RTT, and that fragmentation is the last thing we want. While I'm not fond of some of Douglas' terms, I feel strongly that "standard" RTT shouldn't only grow in the greenhouse. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC) | : To Mike: I disagree on this. I believe Douglas and I both share the sense that we only want to maintain one RTT, and that fragmentation is the last thing we want. While I'm not fond of some of Douglas' terms, I feel strongly that "standard" RTT shouldn't only grow in the greenhouse. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: Flora: Douglas and Dave already have a project on here which is openly from their perspective and in which they use terminology differently, and present their reasons for doing so. So if this usage of "map" is part of the terminology they are using in those pages then I don't think there's any harm in putting that explicitly within the page. Are you saying we should incorporate this usage of "map" into "one RTT?" Or incorporate *everything* they've done into "one RTT?" [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 02:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:27, 21 December 2021
Can we get a note clarifying that this is the terminology being used in Douglas's system, rather than in standard RTT, in particular elsewhere on this Wiki? Also, can we add a category to these pages which are part of Douglas's system and which use this alternate terminology? Mike Battaglia (talk) 02:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- (The above comment was from Mike, he just forgot to sign it) Mike If it would be convenient for you, I don't have a problem with it if you want to create a category on the wiki and add it to all pages I've contributed to. Again, I list the contributions that I care most about on my user page, so that could be a quick reference for you.
- Given Keenan's recent rewrite, yes, I think it would be a good idea to mention as another example that the 1st and 3rd bullets are the way Dave and I use it too. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 01:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- To Mike: I disagree on this. I believe Douglas and I both share the sense that we only want to maintain one RTT, and that fragmentation is the last thing we want. While I'm not fond of some of Douglas' terms, I feel strongly that "standard" RTT shouldn't only grow in the greenhouse. FloraC (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Flora: Douglas and Dave already have a project on here which is openly from their perspective and in which they use terminology differently, and present their reasons for doing so. So if this usage of "map" is part of the terminology they are using in those pages then I don't think there's any harm in putting that explicitly within the page. Are you saying we should incorporate this usage of "map" into "one RTT?" Or incorporate *everything* they've done into "one RTT?" Mike Battaglia (talk) 02:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)