Talk:Isoharmonic chord/WikispacesArchive: Difference between revisions
m 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage |
m Fredg999 moved page Talk:Isoharmonic chords/WikispacesArchive to Talk:Isoharmonic chord/WikispacesArchive: Singular title by convention |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 17:10, 5 September 2021
ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page. All new discussion should go on Talk:Isoharmonic chord.
Non-just nomenclature?
The article says that isoharmonic only applies to just chords.
What about chords like (1):(sqrt(3)):(2*sqrt(3)-1)? The distances between notes are equal in linear measurements, but the ratios are not just. There must be a better name than "equal-hertz", I hope.
- Sarzadoce August 09, 2011, 11:57:58 PM UTC-0700
If there is no current naming standard, I propose to name them "Equal-Beating," a name which Mike uses a lot. This would be a broader category, including all isoharmonic chords but also including a plethora of irrational chords.
- Sarzadoce August 10, 2011, 12:04:15 AM UTC-0700
Equal beating is OK. I suppose arithmetic progression chords wouldn't please most people, but it does have the advantage of telling you just exactly what it is.
- genewardsmith August 10, 2011, 12:11:15 AM UTC-0700