Talk:MOS naming: Difference between revisions

Ayceman (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:
::: On &/@ - that may be so, but so are +/- and Unicode support for stylizing inline text isn't coming anytime soon. I would strongly suggest A+/B- or */` (A*/`B). [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 18:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
::: On &/@ - that may be so, but so are +/- and Unicode support for stylizing inline text isn't coming anytime soon. I would strongly suggest A+/B- or */` (A*/`B). [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 18:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
::: I'll add that the prefixes should probably stay, as they could be used for the traditional harmonic system (#/b/maj/min/aug/dim/perf), maybe call that THARMS [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 19:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
::: I'll add that the prefixes should probably stay, as they could be used for the traditional harmonic system (#/b/maj/min/aug/dim/perf), maybe call that THARMS [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 19:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Suggested compromise:
* Generator: ''perfect'' (e.g. perfect mos4th, Pmos4)
* Smaller interval class (when not the generator's): ''small'' (e.g. small mos3rd, smos3)
* Larger interval class (when not the generator's): ''large'' (e.g. large mos3rd, Lmos3)
* "small" minus chroma or "perfect" minus chroma: ''diminished'' (e.g. diminished mos3rd, dmos3)
* "large" plus chroma or "perfect" plus chroma: ''augmented'' (e.g. augmented mos3rd, Amos3)
Return to "MOS naming" page.