Talk:Chalmersia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Not really. We both know one of them is the intended name and the others are mistakes. If Scala goes with ''chalmersia'' then let's trust it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC) | :: Not really. We both know one of them is the intended name and the others are mistakes. If Scala goes with ''chalmersia'' then let's trust it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: I am only sure that while one is the intended name and most others are mistakes, the name "chalmersma" in | ::: I am only sure that while one is the intended name and most others are mistakes, the name "chalmersma" in particular has a few other hits on this wiki, and [[User:Spt3125|Spt3125]] has previously [[Talk:List of superparticular intervals/WikispacesArchive|gone on record]] saying they find "chalmersia" to be a bit odd. | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 27 December 2020
Sure about the correct spelling?
Chalmersia vs chalmersima vs chalmersma. FloraC (talk) 14:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I just know that "chalmersia" is the spelling used on the Huygens-Fokker Foundation's interval list, so this is the spelling used as the title of the article. However, if there are other alternative spellings, or if there is a dispute about these spellings, those factors should be noted in the article. --Aura (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am only sure that while one is the intended name and most others are mistakes, the name "chalmersma" in particular has a few other hits on this wiki, and Spt3125 has previously gone on record saying they find "chalmersia" to be a bit odd.