Talk:56/45: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Aura (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
6,010 edits
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
6,010 edits
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Maybe the [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=56/45&diff=prev&oldid=53728 addition to the marvel category] was wrong. How can we decide which intervals belong into [[:Category:Marvel]]? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Maybe the [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=56/45&diff=prev&oldid=53728 addition to the marvel category] was wrong. How can we decide which intervals belong into [[:Category:Marvel]]? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


: I'm personally thinking that "marvelous intervals" are indeed those that differ from 3-limit and 5-limit by [[225/224]].  Where the resulting 7-limit interval is something like [[7/4]] or [[8/7]], that is a different story as these two intervals belong directly in the chain of 7 prime intervals.  Furthermore, we should remember that marvelous intervals always have a second function, and that function should be acknowledged.  After all, there's a reason I call 7/4 a "Varicant"- it simultaneously acts as both a subminor seventh and a type of sixth, with the former behavior being consistent with the nature of its relation to both [[4/3]] and [[3/2]], and the latter behavior being consistent with the nature of its relation to both [[5/4]] and [[11/8]].  I don't know how good this idea is, but I suspect that it's a start. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
: I'm personally thinking that "marvelous intervals" are the more complex 7-limit intervals that differ from 3-limit and 5-limit by [[225/224]].  Where the resulting 7-limit interval is something like [[7/4]] or [[8/7]], that is a different story as these two intervals are simple, and [[7/6]] and [[9/7]] similarly don't count for much the same reason.  Furthermore, we should remember that marvelous intervals always have a second function, and that function should be acknowledged.  After all, there's a reason I call 7/4 a "Varicant"- it simultaneously acts as both a subminor seventh and a type of sixth, with the former behavior being consistent with the nature of its relation to both [[4/3]] and [[3/2]], and the latter behavior being consistent with the nature of its relation to both [[5/4]] and [[11/8]].  I don't know how good this idea is, but I suspect that it's a start. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:31, 29 November 2020

Criterion for a Marvelous intervals

Maybe the addition to the marvel category was wrong. How can we decide which intervals belong into Category:Marvel? --Xenwolf (talk) 13:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm personally thinking that "marvelous intervals" are the more complex 7-limit intervals that differ from 3-limit and 5-limit by 225/224. Where the resulting 7-limit interval is something like 7/4 or 8/7, that is a different story as these two intervals are simple, and 7/6 and 9/7 similarly don't count for much the same reason. Furthermore, we should remember that marvelous intervals always have a second function, and that function should be acknowledged. After all, there's a reason I call 7/4 a "Varicant"- it simultaneously acts as both a subminor seventh and a type of sixth, with the former behavior being consistent with the nature of its relation to both 4/3 and 3/2, and the latter behavior being consistent with the nature of its relation to both 5/4 and 11/8. I don't know how good this idea is, but I suspect that it's a start. --Aura (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:56/45&oldid=53755"