User talk:Arseniiv/Factorization: Difference between revisions
→numbers as names: there was another reply too |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::::: I read it only now (same idea nearly at the same time🙂). I think <code>^</code> looks better, it's now also possible to stuff space around the operators. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ::::: I read it only now (same idea nearly at the same time🙂). I think <code>^</code> looks better, it's now also possible to stuff space around the operators. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Missed your developments while extending my version. This code is way simpler but it needs obligatory <code>*</code>s… or that can be changed? How do you think about if <code>*</code> are needed? --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 23: | :::::: Missed your developments while extending my version. This code is way simpler but it needs obligatory <code>*</code>s… or that can be changed? How do you think about if <code>*</code> are needed? | ||
:::::: It seems I should have written another reply here and not in [[User talk:Arseniiv#Infobox helper]], ow. Reposting it here now: | |||
:::::: ❝ When you’re back, please look at the current version. I think it works as expected. It also does understand <code>^</code> for <code>**</code>, doesn’t shy from excess spaces, and makes minuses into unicode minus − which is a bit higher and wider than - and matches + and tall characters like digits: −+- −3 -3. But the code is almost unreadable and I needed to use <code>#regex</code> twice, otherwise the dots in the middle were deleted together with the trailing one. {{User:Arseniiv/Factorization|2**3 * 5 * 7^ -5 * 11 ** 9 19 ^-4}} ❞ --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 23:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | |||