Talk:KISS notation: Difference between revisions

Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
sorry: I categozied the talk page instead of the page. Undo revision 45326 by Xenwolf (talk)
Tag: Undo
Bozu (talk | contribs)
Line 18: Line 18:


::: Now to develop another notation system, as long as it's based on a scale, we will have such a center, whatever its signifier is, and we'll need the signifier-frequency form to tune it (or how do you tune it?). Do you need a particular frequency for a particular tuning? Probably not. You just take one frequency and tune everything, including the diatonic scale. So the choice is down to one of the frequencies in that scale. Which one? My answer is obvious. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
::: Now to develop another notation system, as long as it's based on a scale, we will have such a center, whatever its signifier is, and we'll need the signifier-frequency form to tune it (or how do you tune it?). Do you need a particular frequency for a particular tuning? Probably not. You just take one frequency and tune everything, including the diatonic scale. So the choice is down to one of the frequencies in that scale. Which one? My answer is obvious. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
:::: I'm not sure about that logic, though, since it suggests Eb as a reference pitch.
Return to "KISS notation" page.