Talk:Relative errors of small EDOs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:: Maybe I can help you with this, I'm a professional programmer who can automate this with Perl or Python. I'd also hand you the script for further adaption then ... Please tell me if this sounds right to you. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC) | :: Maybe I can help you with this, I'm a professional programmer who can automate this with Perl or Python. I'd also hand you the script for further adaption then ... Please tell me if this sounds right to you. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: Nice. | |||
::: I don't suppose your script generates those values (cuz I did so in C), just doing with the table, right? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:52, 15 May 2020
(WIP) Relative Errors of Small Edos
I did a change to the upper table to right-align the numbers, I hope that's okay. Here some (hopefully helpful) suggestions:
- leave out the repetitive
/1
in the headings - leave out the column for prime
2
- switch from permille with one decimal place to the more common percent with two decimal places
Best regards --Xenwolf (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- > right-align
- Thx. No idea how you did it.
- > leave out the repetitive
/1
in the headings - > leave out the column for prime
2
- Although this article is about edos, the method is valid for all rank-1 temperaments. For non-octave temperaments, the errors of, for example, 3/1 and 3/2 are different. Maybe I'll do ed3, ed5, etc. in the future. That's the reason why the /1 and prime 2 are there.
- > percent
- I'll do the switch after I fill it all up to see if it looks better. FloraC (talk) 15:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)