Talk:Relative errors of small EDOs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* switch from permille with one decimal place to the more common percent with two decimal places | * switch from permille with one decimal place to the more common percent with two decimal places | ||
Best regards --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC) | Best regards --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:26, 14 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
: > right-align | |||
: Thx. No idea how you did it. | |||
: > leave out the repetitive <code>/1</code> in the headings | |||
: > leave out the column for prime <code>2</code> | |||
: Although this article is about edos, the method is valid for all rank-1 temperaments. For non-octave temperaments, the errors of, for example, 3/1 and 3/2 are different. Maybe I'll do ed3, ed5, etc. in the future. That's the reason why the /1 and prime 2 are there. | |||
: > percent | |||
: I'll do the switch after I fill it all up to see if it looks better. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC) | |||