User talk:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:46, 1 October 2018 view source Gareth.hearne (talk \| contribs) 264 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:05, 1 October 2018 view source PiotrGrochowski (talk \| contribs) 981 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	::No I was referring to where you said you might do another one based on 50edo. I'm not a big fan of 43edo so I like the idea of that one, though it is more important of course that the interval names feel right than what edo it's based on --[[User:Gareth.hearne\|Gareth.hearne]] ([[User talk:Gareth.hearne\|talk]]) 17:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)		::No I was referring to where you said you might do another one based on 50edo. I'm not a big fan of 43edo so I like the idea of that one, though it is more important of course that the interval names feel right than what edo it's based on --[[User:Gareth.hearne\|Gareth.hearne]] ([[User talk:Gareth.hearne\|talk]]) 17:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
			:::Oh, ok. All meantone edos are quite cute in my opinion, whether grosstone, meanpop or not septimal meantone. The 50edo–based system will of course have 7 more names, which may affect which intermediates (unison–second, second–third, etc.) are present. [[User:PiotrGrochowski\|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski\|talk]]) 18:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)