Talk:Septischismic family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Hotcrystal0 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
: Septigarismic/septigaric follows through with the established patterns, but I'd leave that only for the 7-limit version. For 11-limit and above, ''garylympic'' is a better fit, useful all the way to the 19-limit version. | : Septigarismic/septigaric follows through with the established patterns, but I'd leave that only for the 7-limit version. For 11-limit and above, ''garylympic'' is a better fit, useful all the way to the 19-limit version. | ||
: As for ''Ultimate'', I make a case that a rename to this demonstrates clear benefits, beyond subjectivity, measured and compared with other alternative sequences that make fierce competition. The rename is an advertisement for what this temperament represents: a detemperament sequence's practical end. --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 16:48, 13 August 2026 (UTC) | : As for ''Ultimate'', I make a case that a rename to this demonstrates clear benefits, beyond subjectivity, measured and compared with other alternative sequences that make fierce competition. The rename is an advertisement for what this temperament represents: a detemperament sequence's practical end. --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 16:48, 13 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: in my DMs with Eufalesio I stated that the only the higher-limit version should be called ''ultimate''. The 7-limit or 2.3.7 version can keep its current name or get renamed. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 18:06, 13 August 2026 (UTC) | |||