Talk:Septischismic family: Difference between revisions
Hotcrystal0 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:I don’t think ''ultimate'' is a good name, but septischisma/septimal schisma could work (though I don’t fully support renaming this temp yet). <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 15:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC) | :I don’t think ''ultimate'' is a good name, but septischisma/septimal schisma could work (though I don’t fully support renaming this temp yet). <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 15:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
: Septigaric is good for the 2.3.7 version, possibly ''septigar'' and have the comma be the ''septigarsma'' or ''septigar comma''. But how do you call the 2.3.7.11 version? Undegaric? Garylympian? | |||
: Septigarismic/septigaric follows through with the established patterns, but I'd leave that only for the 7-limit version. For 11-limit and above, ''garylympic'' is a better fit, useful all the way to the 19-limit version. | |||
: As for ''Ultimate'', I make a case that a rename to this demonstrates clear benefits, beyond subjectivity, measured and compared with other alternative sequences that make fierce competition. The rename is an advertisement for what this temperament represents: a detemperament sequence's practical end. --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 16:48, 13 August 2026 (UTC) | |||