Talk:Septischismic family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::: I agree with FloraC here. It’s not much of a problem. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | ::: I agree with FloraC here. It’s not much of a problem. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
So Eufalesio and I came to the agreement that the names of this family of temps need another round of assessment. | |||
I maintain that ''septischisma'' is the ideal name for the comma. The derived temp name ''septischismic'' mirrors ''aberschismic'' and ''orthoschismic''. However, this poses the problem of how to name the 2.3.7-subgroup temp. (As a rule, we don't apply the first declension to ''-schisma'', resulting in ''-schic''.) Not changing ''gary'' is an option, but ideally we'd want a name that rivals the monumentality of ''schismic''. | |||
Alternatively, ''septigarisma'' captures the nature that this is the 2.3.7 comma tempered out in garibaldi, and provides the names ''septigarismic'' and ''septigaric'' for the 2.3.5.7 and 2.3.7 temps. | |||
''Garisma'', as I said, doesn't fix any problem, tho its derived temp names ''garismic'' and ''garic'' are neat. | |||
Then we have cassaschismic, and the question of whether it's canonical w.r.t. garischismic or will. It looks like will and cassachismic aren't as closely related as garischismic and cassaschismic are. I'd say it's best to treat will and cassaschismic as separate temps, so renaming cassaschismic based on ''will'' is off the table. | |||
Eufalesio proposes ''ultimate''. I'm afraid this creates ambiguities as ''ultimate'' describes a subjective quality that will mean differently to different ppl. In the spirit that rename should demonstrate clear benefits, I think there are only two options for this: either we make it canonical, adopting the changed name of garischismic, or we don't change anything. | |||
—[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:25, 13 August 2026 (UTC) | |||