Talk:11413376/11413325: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Eufalesio (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


: It IS musically relevant, but the place where this is relevant is a temperament that's listed in my user page [[User:Eufalesio/Ultimate#Insatinismic_AKA_Batshittin|here]], and I don't know exactly where to put this... --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 06:10, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
: It IS musically relevant, but the place where this is relevant is a temperament that's listed in my user page [[User:Eufalesio/Ultimate#Insatinismic_AKA_Batshittin|here]], and I don't know exactly where to put this... --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 06:10, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
: I agree that I would like to see more justification for a comma of that level of complexity, ideally with a concrete example. Of course, I have the same opinion for existing comma pages, but it's more obvious when new pages are created that this should be taken in consideration. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 06:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:23, 28 June 2026

Notability

Does not meet XW:NG as far as I'm concerned. – Sintel🎏 (talk) 00:51, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

It IS musically relevant, but the place where this is relevant is a temperament that's listed in my user page here, and I don't know exactly where to put this... --Eufalesio (talk) 06:10, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
I agree that I would like to see more justification for a comma of that level of complexity, ideally with a concrete example. Of course, I have the same opinion for existing comma pages, but it's more obvious when new pages are created that this should be taken in consideration. --Fredg999 (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)