Talk:Pythrabian comma: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:08, 30 April 2026 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,010 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 18:31, 30 April 2026 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,129 edits No edit summary
Line 3:		Line 3:

	: Okay, I definitely think that comma deserves to be treated like both the Pythagorean and Alpharabian commas in that it should have a distinct common name from which we can derive temperament names. However, I'm not sure which common name we should use for this. I think we'll have to brainstorm at some point. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 17:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)		: Okay, I definitely think that comma deserves to be treated like both the Pythagorean and Alpharabian commas in that it should have a distinct common name from which we can derive temperament names. However, I'm not sure which common name we should use for this. I think we'll have to brainstorm at some point. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 17:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

			:: In that case, I've proposed ''undecapyth comma'' / ''undecapythma'', following the pattern of ''tridecapyth comma''. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 18:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC)