Talk:Schismatic family: Difference between revisions

Line 16:

==about Maqamschismic==

assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ==about Maqamschismic==
 assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
+ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)