Talk:Porcupine family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Re |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::: How so, given porcupine extensions agree on the mapping for 11 more than they do for 7? --[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 16:01, 11 May 2025 (UTC) | :::: How so, given porcupine extensions agree on the mapping for 11 more than they do for 7? --[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 16:01, 11 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
::::: That's irrelevant. One gets 7-limit porcupine by tempering 7-limit JI, which makes perfectly valid musical sense. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:30, 12 May 2025
But porkypine is the canonical extension?
I see no reason why the page should not start with 2.3.5, then go to 2.3.5.11, and then proceed to extensions to 7 and 13.
- 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine ("porkypine") is a canonical extension, so is 7- and 11-limit porcupine. Since porcupine is a full 11-limit temp, there's no reason to pick the subgroups within it instead of simply going 5-, 7-, and 11-limit. FloraC (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, but like, it makes no musical sense to restrict porcupine to 2.3.5.7. Does 7 somehow have some inherent priority over 11? --VectorGraphics (talk) 20:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- How so, given porcupine extensions agree on the mapping for 11 more than they do for 7? --VectorGraphics (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2025 (UTC)