Ternary scale theorems: Difference between revisions

ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
Line 44: Line 44:


Assuming SGA, we have two chains of the aggregate generator '''g''' (going right). In the diagrams below, O represents a note and - represents a generator '''g'''. The two cases are:
Assuming SGA, we have two chains of the aggregate generator '''g''' (going right). In the diagrams below, O represents a note and - represents a generator '''g'''. The two cases are:
<pre>
  CASE 1: EVEN LENGTH
  CASE 1: EVEN LENGTH
  O-O-...-O ({{frac|''n''|2}} notes)
  O-O-...-O (''n''/2 notes)
  O-O-...-O ({{frac|''n''|2}} notes)
  O-O-...-O (''n''/2 notes)
and  
</pre>
and
<pre>
  CASE 2: ODD LENGTH
  CASE 2: ODD LENGTH
  O-O-O-...-O ({{frac|''n'' + 1|2}} notes)
  O-O-O-...-O ((''n'' + 1)/2 notes)
  O-O-...-O ({{frac|''n'' &minus; 1|2}} notes).
  O-O-...-O ((''n'' 1)/2 notes).
</pre>


Label the notes (1, ''j'') and (2, ''j''), {{nowrap|1 &le; ''j'' &le; ''N''}} where ''N'' is the number of notes in the chain, for notes in the upper and lower chain, respectively.
Label the notes (1, ''j'') and (2, ''j''), {{nowrap|1 &le; ''j'' &le; ''N''}} where ''N'' is the number of notes in the chain, for notes in the upper and lower chain, respectively.
==== Statement (1) ====
==== Statement (1) ====
In case 1, let {{nowrap|'''g'''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} (2, 1) &minus; (1, 1)|'''g'''<sub>2</sub> {{=}} (1, 2) &minus; (2, 1)}}, and {{nowrap|'''g'''<sub>3</sub> {{=}} (1, 1) &minus; ({{frac|''n''|2}}, 2)}} {{nowrap|{{=}} (({{frac|&minus;''n''|2}} &minus; 1)*'''g'''<sub>1</sub> &minus; {{frac|''n''|2}}*'''g'''<sub>2</sub>) (mod '''e''')}}. We assume that '''g'''<sub>1</sub>, '''g'''<sub>2</sub> and '''e''' are ℤ-linearly independent. We have the chain '''g'''<sub>1</sub> '''g'''<sub>2</sub> '''g'''<sub>1</sub> '''g'''<sub>2</sub> ... '''g'''<sub>1</sub> '''g'''<sub>3</sub> which visits every note in ''s''.  
In case 1, let {{nowrap|'''g'''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} (2, 1) &minus; (1, 1)|'''g'''<sub>2</sub> {{=}} (1, 2) &minus; (2, 1)}}, and {{nowrap|'''g'''<sub>3</sub> {{=}} (1, 1) &minus; ({{frac|''n''|2}}, 2)}} {{nowrap|{{=}} (({{frac|&minus;''n''|2}} &minus; 1)*'''g'''<sub>1</sub> &minus; {{frac|''n''|2}}*'''g'''<sub>2</sub>) (mod '''e''')}}. We assume that '''g'''<sub>1</sub>, '''g'''<sub>2</sub> and '''e''' are ℤ-linearly independent. We have the chain '''g'''<sub>1</sub> '''g'''<sub>2</sub> '''g'''<sub>1</sub> '''g'''<sub>2</sub> ... '''g'''<sub>1</sub> '''g'''<sub>3</sub> which visits every note in ''s''.