Stretched and compressed tuning: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
m In xenharmonic music: add 2 examples
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
m Links, bold
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikipedia|Stretched tuning}}
{{Wikipedia|Stretched tuning}}
Tunings do not necessarily need equaves to be tuned to their exact ratios, and in some cases, octaves are best stretched or compressed.
[[Tuning]]s do not necessarily need [[equave]]s to be tuned to their exact [[ratio]]s, and in some cases, equaves (most often [[octave]]s) are best stretched or compressed.


In stretched tuning, two notes an [[equivalence]] apart, whose fundamental frequencies theoretically have an exact ratio, are tuned slightly farther apart (a stretched [[equivalence]]).
In '''stretched tuning''', two notes an [[equivalence]] apart, whose fundamental frequencies theoretically have an exact ratio, are tuned slightly farther apart (a stretched equivalence).


In compressed tuning, also known as narrowed tuning, two notes an [[equivalence]] apart, whose fundamental frequencies theoretically have an exact ratio, are tuned slightly closer together (a compressed or narrowed [[equivalence]]).
In '''compressed tuning''', also known as narrowed tuning, two notes an equivalence apart, whose fundamental frequencies theoretically have an exact ratio, are tuned slightly closer together (a compressed or narrowed equivalence).


== In 12edo ==
== In 12edo ==