Delta-rational chord: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m →Class II: Oops |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''delta-rational''' ('''DR''') chord is a [[chord]] that has integer ratios between frequency ''differences'' of some pair of dyads, called '''deltas''', with the dyads in question assumed to be between successive notes ( | A '''delta-rational''' ('''DR''') chord is a [[chord]] that has integer ratios between frequency ''differences'' of some pair of dyads, called '''deltas''', with the dyads in question assumed to be between successive notes (Δ, capital delta, is often used to denote "difference"). | ||
DR chords generalize JI chords, in which all frequency differences of dyads are exactly integer ratios. But unlike JI chords, a DR chord need not have integer ratios between frequencies of notes. For example, the [[13edo]] chord {{dash|0, 3, 8, 10|med}}\13 ({{dash|0¢, 277¢, 738¢, 923¢|med}}) is close to being delta-rational, because the frequency difference of the dyad 8–10\13 is 0.994 times the frequency difference of the dyad 0–3\13. (In the exactly DR chord {{dash|0\13, 3\13, 8\13, 924.159¢}}, the 3rd and 4th notes have exactly the same frequency difference as the dyad 0-3\13.) | DR chords generalize JI chords, in which all frequency differences of dyads are exactly integer ratios. But unlike JI chords, a DR chord need not have integer ratios between frequencies of notes. For example, the [[13edo]] chord {{dash|0, 3, 8, 10|med}}\13 ({{dash|0¢, 277¢, 738¢, 923¢|med}}) is close to being delta-rational, because the frequency difference of the dyad 8–10\13 is 0.994 times the frequency difference of the dyad 0–3\13. (In the exactly DR chord {{dash|0\13, 3\13, 8\13, 924.159¢}}, the 3rd and 4th notes have exactly the same frequency difference as the dyad 0-3\13.) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=== Delta signature === | === Delta signature === | ||
A delta-rational chord is determined by two things: | A delta-rational chord is determined by two things: | ||
* | * The dyad formed by its lowermost two notes; | ||
* | * Its ''delta signature'' which has integer ratios, i.e. a list of (scaled) frequency increases between successive notes, their ratios showing the simple rational relationships, with a + before each increase. Note that it is whether the deltas are rationally related ''to each other'' that defines DR, not whether the deltas are related to the frequency of the root. If we divide every term by the first term to make the first term 1, the result is called a ''normalized delta signature''. | ||
* Two delta signatures are equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by scaling by a positive real number. For example, +2+e+3 is equivalent to +2φ+eφ+3φ, and both signatures imply a delta-rational chord. | * Two delta signatures are equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by scaling by a positive real number. For example, +2+e+3 is equivalent to +2φ+eφ+3φ, and both signatures imply a delta-rational chord. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
== Least-squares error == | == Least-squares error == | ||
=== Fully DR === | === Fully DR === | ||
The idea motivating least-squares error on a chord as an approximation to a given delta signature is the following: Say we want the error of a chord 1:''r''<sub>1</sub>:''r''<sub>2</sub>:...:''r''<sub>''n''</sub> (in increasing order), with {{nowrap|''n'' > 1}}, in the linear domain as an approximation to a fully delta-rational chord with signature {{nowrap|+ | The idea motivating least-squares error on a chord as an approximation to a given delta signature is the following: Say we want the error of a chord 1:''r''<sub>1</sub>:''r''<sub>2</sub>:...:''r''<sub>''n''</sub> (in increasing order), with {{nowrap|''n'' > 1}}, in the linear domain as an approximation to a fully delta-rational chord with signature {{nowrap|+δ<sub>1</sub> +δ<sub>2</sub> ... +δ<sub>''n''</sub> | ||
}} (where the delta signature is written based on the chord written to have root 1), i.e. a chord | }} (where the delta signature is written based on the chord written to have root 1), i.e. a chord | ||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
One may be able to tune a rank-2 regular temperament in such a way that a triad of interest exactly "inherits" its delta signature from a simple JI preimage thereof. This is done by setting up an algebraic equation relating the intervals in the chord to a generator and then solving for the generator that produces proportionally-beating triads. The value to be solved for is the generator's frequency ratio (not its cent value). | One may be able to tune a rank-2 regular temperament in such a way that a triad of interest exactly "inherits" its delta signature from a simple JI preimage thereof. This is done by setting up an algebraic equation relating the intervals in the chord to a generator and then solving for the generator that produces proportionally-beating triads. The value to be solved for is the generator's frequency ratio (not its cent value). | ||
If we want to optimize a 4:5:6 triad in Meantone, for instance, we want a +1+1 delta signature, or equivalently a 1:1 ratio of frequency deltas between the major third and minor third. Fixing any frequency as the triad's root and letting <math>g</math> be the frequency ratio for the perfect fifth generator for meantone, the minor third in the tempered 4:5:6 triad has a delta of < | If we want to optimize a 4:5:6 triad in Meantone, for instance, we want a +1+1 delta signature, or equivalently a 1:1 ratio of frequency deltas between the major third and minor third. Fixing any frequency as the triad's root and letting <math>g</math> be the frequency ratio for the perfect fifth generator for meantone, the minor third in the tempered 4:5:6 triad has a delta of {{nowrap|''g'' − {{sfrac|''g''<sup>4</sup>|4}}}}, and the major third in the same triad has a delta of {{nowrap|{{sfrac|''g''<sup>4</sup>|4}} − 1}}. Therefore to ensure that the two deltas form a 1:1 ratio, we must find the appropriate root of the polynomial {{nowrap|''g''<sup>4</sup> − 2''g'' − 2}} (the difference between the two, simplified to make all coefficients integers). This results in a generator of 1.4945, or about 695.6 cents. | ||
Note that the equation to solve depends on what chord you want to tune as equal-beating. For example, assuming pure octaves, Meantone admits an equation for tuning the 3:4:5 as equal-beating: < | Note that the equation to solve depends on what chord you want to tune as equal-beating. For example, assuming pure octaves, Meantone admits an equation for tuning the 3:4:5 as equal-beating: {{nowrap|''g''<sup>4</sup> + 2''g'' − 8 {{=}} 0}} The latter equation has solution {{nowrap|''g'' {{=}} 1.4960 {{=}} 697.3¢}}. <!--Essentially tempered [[Dyadic chord|dyadic]] triads are also more difficult to tune with simple delta-signatures, since they lack simple JI preimages.--> | ||
Below is a list of temperaments and their various optimizations for proportionally beating chords. They are ordered by highest power in the relevant DR polynomial, with ties broken by leading coefficients, then 2nd term coefficients, 3rd term coefficients, 4th term coefficients, etc. In the case of negative coefficients, only the absolute value is considered. | Below is a list of temperaments and their various optimizations for proportionally beating chords. They are ordered by highest power in the relevant DR polynomial, with ties broken by leading coefficients, then 2nd term coefficients, 3rd term coefficients, 4th term coefficients, etc. In the case of negative coefficients, only the absolute value is considered. | ||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
| | | | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| | | −1 | ||
| | | −1 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
| | | | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| | | −1 | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
| | | | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| 6:7:9 | | 6:7:9 | ||
| +1+2 | | +1+2 | ||
| Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −1 | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 217: | Line 217: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −4 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
| | | | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| | | −4 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −4 | ||
| | | −4 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 281: | Line 281: | ||
| | | | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 302: | Line 302: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −2 | ||
| | | −4 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 315: | Line 315: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −4 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −16 | ||
| 4:5:7 | | 4:5:7 | ||
| +1+2 | | +1+2 | ||
| Line 333: | Line 333: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −1 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −1 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 347: | Line 347: | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −1 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 354: | Line 354: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −4 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 371: | Line 371: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | −8 | ||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 382: | Line 382: | ||
Interpreting simple JI chords as signatures/templates for delta-rational chords is reasonable, as the psychoacoustic effect of DR is more robust to detuning than that of JI for many people, but it is no panacea. If the temperament is too inaccurate, other inversions and voicings of a given JI chord will not have the DR signatures preserved acceptably, and compromising will make all of them less accurate, though this of course depends on what error tolerance you prefer. This is because DR simplicity is only preserved by inversion and revoicing if the chord in question is low-complexity JI; that all inversions of a chord preserve the JI chord's delta signature with low enough error is thus a sensible criterion for a "good" temperament. | Interpreting simple JI chords as signatures/templates for delta-rational chords is reasonable, as the psychoacoustic effect of DR is more robust to detuning than that of JI for many people, but it is no panacea. If the temperament is too inaccurate, other inversions and voicings of a given JI chord will not have the DR signatures preserved acceptably, and compromising will make all of them less accurate, though this of course depends on what error tolerance you prefer. This is because DR simplicity is only preserved by inversion and revoicing if the chord in question is low-complexity JI; that all inversions of a chord preserve the JI chord's delta signature with low enough error is thus a sensible criterion for a "good" temperament. | ||
For example, take 0.00807 (the least-squares error of 0 | For example, take 0.00807 (the least-squares error of {{dash|0, 2\11, 4\11|med}} as +1+1, approximately equalized 7:8:9) as a somewhat arbitrary but reasonable upper limit of acceptable error. Consider Semaphore temperament (i.e. {{nowrap|2.3.7[14 & 19]}}). Using a gen of 260.346¢, {{dash|0, 679¢, 940¢|med}} is a Semaphore tuning of 4:6:7 that is perfectly +2+1, but inverting the chord yields {{dash|0, 260¢, 521¢|med}} as our 6:7:8, with least-squares error '''0.0118'''; the 7:8:12 has an even higher error of '''0.0178'''. This is also evident by the fact that we had to use an extreme tuning of Semaphore, which has CWE generator 249.311c and CTE generator 248.126¢. If we use the CTE generator, the 4:6:7, 6:7:8, and 7:8:12 have errors '''0.0108''', '''0.0106''', and 0.00737. If we use the average of the CTE and the perfect +2+1 generator, the errors become 0.00535, '''0.0112''', and '''0.0126'''. | ||
== Higher-order differences of frequency == | == Higher-order differences of frequency == | ||
Generalizing, one could consider chords where differences between its frequency deltas (as Tom Price has called them, '''precessions''') are rationally related, while the deltas themselves may not be. This corresponds to chords where differences between various interference beatings go in and out of sync in a periodic manner. One precession-rational chord is 5:5.4142...:6.8284...:9.2426..., a {{nowrap|+( | Generalizing, one could consider chords where differences between its frequency deltas (as Tom Price has called them, '''precessions''') are rationally related, while the deltas themselves may not be. This corresponds to chords where differences between various interference beatings go in and out of sync in a periodic manner. One precession-rational chord is 5:5.4142...:6.8284...:9.2426..., a {{nowrap|+(√2 − 1) +√2 +(√2 + 1)}} chord. | ||
Precession being the second-order difference ( | Precession being the second-order difference (Δ<sup>2</sup>) of frequency, we similarly have the theoretical notions of Δ<sup>3</sup>-rationality, Δ<sup>4</sup>-rationality, and so on. The practical consequences of higher-order differences are as of yet speculative, though a few people have reported finding precession psychoacoustically meaningful. | ||
== Isodifferential chord == | == Isodifferential chord == | ||
In an '''isodifferential chord''' (known variously by '''linear chord''', '''equal-hertz chord''', '''equal-beating chord''', and '''proportional-beating chord'''), the frequencies of the pitches are in an arithmetic sequence, or in other words, there is an equal difference in cycles per second between successive pitches. | In an '''isodifferential chord''' (known variously by '''linear chord''', '''equal-hertz chord''', '''equal-beating chord''', and '''proportional-beating chord'''), the frequencies of the pitches are in an arithmetic sequence, or in other words, there is an equal difference in cycles per second between successive pitches. | ||
===Isoharmonic chord === | === Isoharmonic chord === | ||
An '''isoharmonic chord''' is a specific type of isodifferential chord, where the ratios between the notes are rational numbers, and therefore the chord is in just intonation. Such a chord can be built by successive jumps up the [[harmonic series]] by some number of steps. Since the harmonic series is arranged such that each higher step is smaller than the one before it, all isoharmonic chords have this same shape—with diminishing step size as one ascends. | An '''isoharmonic chord''' is a specific type of isodifferential chord, where the ratios between the notes are rational numbers, and therefore the chord is in just intonation. Such a chord can be built by successive jumps up the [[harmonic series]] by some number of steps. Since the harmonic series is arranged such that each higher step is smaller than the one before it, all isoharmonic chords have this same shape—with diminishing step size as one ascends. | ||
| Line 400: | Line 399: | ||
==== Classification ==== | ==== Classification ==== | ||
===== Class I ===== | ===== Class I ===== | ||
The simplest isoharmonic chords are built by stepping up the harmonic series by single steps (adjacent steps in the harmonic series). Take, for instance, 4:5:6:7, the harmonic seventh chord. We may call these class I isoharmonic chords. There is one class | The simplest isoharmonic chords are built by stepping up the harmonic series by single steps (adjacent steps in the harmonic series). Take, for instance, 4:5:6:7, the harmonic seventh chord. We may call these class I isoharmonic chords. There is one class I series (the harmonic series), which looks like this: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 474: | Line 473: | ||
===== Class II ===== | ===== Class II ===== | ||
The next simplest isoharmonic chords are built by stepping up the harmonic series by two (skipping every other harmonic). This gives us chords such as 3:5:7:9 (the primary tetrad in the [[ | The next simplest isoharmonic chords are built by stepping up the harmonic series by two (skipping every other harmonic). This gives us chords such as 3:5:7:9 (the primary tetrad in the [[Bohlen–Pierce]] tuning system) and 9:11:13:15. Note that if you start on an even number, your chord is equivalent to a class I harmonic chord: {{nowrap|4:6:8:10 {{=}} 2:3:4:5}}. Thus, there is one class II series (the series of all odd harmonics): | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 546: | Line 545: | ||
===== Class III ===== | ===== Class III ===== | ||
Class III isoharmonic chords are less common and more complex sounding. They include chords such as 7:10:13:16 and 14:17:20:23. Note that if you start on a number divisible by three, you'll again get a chord reducible to class | Class III isoharmonic chords are less common and more complex sounding. They include chords such as 7:10:13:16 and 14:17:20:23. Note that if you start on a number divisible by three, you'll again get a chord reducible to class I (e.g. {{nowrap|9:12:15 {{=}} 3:4:5}}). There are two series for class III: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 686: | Line 685: | ||
|} | |} | ||
===== Class | ===== Class IV ===== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 826: | Line 824: | ||
|} | |} | ||
===== Class | ===== Class V ===== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 1,107: | Line 1,104: | ||
Some complex isoharmonic chords can be expressed with an offset from a simpler isoharmonic chord, so it is useful to notate them in a compact and readable way. For example, 41:51:61 is very similar to 4:5:6, so it can be notated as (4:5:6)[+0.1]. Similarly, (20:22:24:27:30:33:36)[+0.339] can be expanded to 20339:22339:24339:27339:30339:33339:36339. | Some complex isoharmonic chords can be expressed with an offset from a simpler isoharmonic chord, so it is useful to notate them in a compact and readable way. For example, 41:51:61 is very similar to 4:5:6, so it can be notated as (4:5:6)[+0.1]. Similarly, (20:22:24:27:30:33:36)[+0.339] can be expanded to 20339:22339:24339:27339:30339:33339:36339. | ||
Irrational isodifferential chords can be expressed with the same notation by using irrational numbers within the square brackets. For example, the chord (1:2:3)[+ | Irrational isodifferential chords can be expressed with the same notation by using irrational numbers within the square brackets. For example, the chord (1:2:3)[+φ] can be expanded to {{nowrap|(1 + φ):(2 + φ):(3 + φ)}}, which is approximately equal to 1.618:2.618:3.618. | ||
Here is a table which uses the "delta ratio set" | == Categorization of DR chords == | ||
* | Here is a table which uses the "delta ratio set"–the set of unique [[Undirected_value|undirected ratios]] between the deltas of a chord's delta signature–to categorize chords. | ||
* | * '''How to tell a DR chord from a non-DR chord:''' a DR chord has at least one rational number in its delta ratio set. | ||
* | * '''Within DR chords, how to tell an FDR chord from a non-fully DR chord:''' a FDR chord has ''only'' rational numbers in its delta ratio set. | ||
* '''Within FDR chords, how to tell an isodifferential chord from a non-isodifferential chord:''' an isodiffential chord has only 1 in its delta ratio set. | |||
All JI chords are FDR chords, because JI chords are rational, and therefore their delta ratio sets will include only rational numbers. | All JI chords are FDR chords, because JI chords are rational, and therefore their delta ratio sets will include only rational numbers. | ||
| Line 1,121: | Line 1,117: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" rowspan="3" | Chord type | ! colspan="4" rowspan="3" | Chord type | ||
! colspan="7" rowspan="1" | Illustrative examples | ! colspan="7" rowspan="1" | Illustrative examples | ||
| Line 1,138: | Line 1,135: | ||
! colspan="1" rowspan="17" | DR | ! colspan="1" rowspan="17" | DR | ||
! colspan="1" rowspan="14" | FDR | ! colspan="1" rowspan="14" | FDR | ||
! colspan="2" rowspan="3" | JI, | ! colspan="2" rowspan="3" | JI, ''not'' isodifferential | ||
| 4:5:7:8 | | 4:5:7:8 | ||
| rowspan="11" | yes, all | | rowspan="11" | yes, all | ||
| Line 1,155: | Line 1,152: | ||
| {{(}}3/2, 2, 3{{)}} | | {{(}}3/2, 2, 3{{)}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="8" | Isoharmonic | ! rowspan="8" | Isoharmonic<br />(JI ''and'' isodifferential) | ||
(JI ''and'' isodifferential) | ! rowspan="3" | Class I | ||
! rowspan="3" | Class | |||
| 4:5:6 | | 4:5:6 | ||
| +1+1 | | +1+1 | ||
| Line 1,170: | Line 1,166: | ||
| 3:4:5:6 | | 3:4:5:6 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="2" | | ! rowspan="2" | Class II | ||
| 3:5:7:9 | | 3:5:7:9 | ||
| rowspan="2" | +2+2+2 | | rowspan="2" | +2+2+2 | ||
| Line 1,176: | Line 1,172: | ||
| 5:7:9:11 | | 5:7:9:11 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan="2" | | ! rowspan="2" | Class III | ||
| 1:4:7:10 | | 1:4:7:10 | ||
| rowspan="2" | +3+3+3 | | rowspan="2" | +3+3+3 | ||
| Line 1,187: | Line 1,183: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" rowspan="2" | Not JI, but isodifferential | ! colspan="2" rowspan="2" | Not JI, but isodifferential | ||
| | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | φ:(φ + 1):(φ + 2):(φ + 3) | ||
| rowspan="7" | No, not all or none | | rowspan="7" | No, not all or none | ||
| +1+1+1 | | +1+1+1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1: | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | 1:φ:(2φ − 1):(3φ − 2) | ||
| +( | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | +(φ − 1)+(φ − 1)+(φ − 1) | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" rowspan="1" | Not JI or isodifferential | ! colspan="2" rowspan="1" | Not JI or isodifferential | ||
| | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | φ:(φ + 1):(φ + 3) | ||
| +1+2 | | +1+2 | ||
| +1+2 | | +1+2 | ||
| no, not all | | no, not all | ||
| { 2 } | | {{(}}2{{)}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="3" rowspan="3" | (Incompletely) DR | ! colspan="3" rowspan="3" | (Incompletely) DR | ||
| 4:5: | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | 4:5:τ:7:9 | ||
| +1+( | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | +1+(τ − 5)+(7 − τ)+2 | ||
| +1+( | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | +1+(τ − 5)+(7 − τ)+2 | ||
| rowspan="5" | (irrelevant for categorization) | | rowspan="5" | (irrelevant for categorization) | ||
| {{(}}(7 | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | {{(}}(7 − τ)/(τ − 5), 7 − τ, τ − 5, 2/(τ − 5), 2, 2/(7 − τ){{)}} | ||
| rowspan="3" | no, but at least one | | rowspan="3" | no, but at least one | ||
|- | |- style="white-space: nowrap;" | ||
| 5:τ:8:(3+ | | 5:τ:8:(3 + τ) | ||
| +( | | +(τ − 5)+(8 − τ)+(τ − 5) | ||
| +1+(8 | | +1+(8 − τ)/(τ − 5)+1 | ||
| {{(}}1, (8 | | {{(}}1, (8 − τ)/(τ − 5) {{)}} | ||
|- | |- style="white-space: nowrap;" | ||
| 1:(1+a):(1+a+b):(1+a+2b):(1+3a+2b), with a/b irrational | | 1:(1 + a):(1 + a + b):(1 + a + 2b):(1 + 3a + 2b),<br />with a/b irrational | ||
| +a+b+b+2a | | +a+b+b+2a | ||
| +a+b+b+2a | | +a+b+b+2a | ||
| Line 1,220: | Line 1,216: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="4" rowspan="2" | Not DR | ! colspan="4" rowspan="2" | Not DR | ||
| 4:5: | | 4:5:τ:7 | ||
| +1+( | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | +1+(τ − 5)+(7 − τ) | ||
| +1+( | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | +1+(τ − 5)+(7 − τ) | ||
| {{(}}(7 | | style="white-space: nowrap;" | {{(}}(7 − τ)/(τ − 5), 7 − τ, τ − 5{{)}} | ||
| rowspan="2" | No, none | | rowspan="2" | No, none | ||
|- | |- style="white-space: nowrap;" | ||
| 5:τ:7 | | 5:τ:7 | ||
| +( | | +(τ − 5)+(7 − τ) | ||
| +1+(7 | | +1+(7 − τ)/(τ − 5) | ||
| {{(}}(7 | | {{(}}(7 − τ)/(τ − 5){{)}} | ||
|} | |} | ||