Talk:Extended meantone notation: Difference between revisions
My Critique |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
... why should the change being made when no one should see it? Please elaborate the change in your user name space (I moved the exact content to [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extended meantone notation]]) and, if ready (meaning someone should read it), replace the content of the article [[Extended meantone notation]]. Don't misunderstand me: it's absolutely okay to change pages in-place, but not to bring a page into a limbo state or a quasi locked state (for two weeks now). I really hope you work it out, I'm looking forward to see the change.<br/> Thanks for your understanding. <br/>Best regards --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | ... why should the change being made when no one should see it? Please elaborate the change in your user name space (I moved the exact content to [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extended meantone notation]]) and, if ready (meaning someone should read it), replace the content of the article [[Extended meantone notation]]. Don't misunderstand me: it's absolutely okay to change pages in-place, but not to bring a page into a limbo state or a quasi locked state (for two weeks now). I really hope you work it out, I'm looking forward to see the change.<br/> Thanks for your understanding. <br/>Best regards --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
== | == Kite's critique == | ||
# Why does the title say meantone, since all of the content applies to or could be applied to non-meantone edos? More on the title later. | # Why does the title say meantone, since all of the content applies to or could be applied to non-meantone edos? More on the title later. | ||