Lumatone mapping for 46edo: Difference between revisions
On crunching the math, echidnic gives the best combination of range and efficiency rather than amity. |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) Add amity back in, but retain Echidnic |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Unfortunately | Unfortunately basic 5-limit chords are quite complex using the [[leapday]] scale, requiring awkward stretches to play. The [[rodan]] mapping is probably more intuitive and has a wider range, but has the disadvantage of skipping a chroma on some of the transitions between columns, making it impossible to play the full gamut of each octave, and each octave is substantially higher up on the keyboard. | ||
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=46|start=18|xstep=9|ystep=-1}} | {{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=46|start=18|xstep=9|ystep=-1}} | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The expanded mapping fixes this, but now the chroma goes diagonally down, requiring an adjustment of playing style when doing chromatic runs. | The expanded mapping fixes this, but now the chroma goes diagonally down, requiring an adjustment of playing style when doing chromatic runs. | ||
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=46|start=21|xstep=9|ystep=-8}} | {{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=46|start=21|xstep=9|ystep=-8}} | ||
The [[amity]] mapping is a good compromise between them, providing an even heptatonic scale while making the full gamut playable, with the chroma going in the correct direction. | |||
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=46|start=41|xstep=7|ystep=-1}} | |||