Talk:256/255: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 22:16, 26 December 2023 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits →comma name proposal: "charisma" ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:26, 27 December 2023 view source Frostburn (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 322 edits Agreeing on the proposal for "charisma". Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: I want to add that "diasemisma" is also, IMO, a slightly confusing name as [[289/288]] which also seems to have claim to the same name reasoning is called the "semitonisma", except in the case of [[289/288]] the corresponding whole tone is [[9/8]] but here it is [[17/15]]. Also, associating the terms "charisma" and "charismic" with Harry Potter seems very unnecessary to me. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 22:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)		: I want to add that "diasemisma" is also, IMO, a slightly confusing name as [[289/288]] which also seems to have claim to the same name reasoning is called the "semitonisma", except in the case of [[289/288]] the corresponding whole tone is [[9/8]] but here it is [[17/15]]. Also, associating the terms "charisma" and "charismic" with Harry Potter seems very unnecessary to me. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 22:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

			: I second this. "Char" is a recognizable programming term and "-isma" is a common postfix for commas not temperaments. --[[User:Frostburn\|Frostburn]] ([[User talk:Frostburn\|talk]]) 05:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)