User:TromboneBoi9: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Hello! My name is Andrew and I like screwing around with xenharmony, especially notation.
Hello! My name is Andrew and I like screwing around with xenharmony, especially notation.


Currently experimenting with anti-diatonic stuff like EDOs 9, 11, 13, 16, and 23.
At some point I plan to make a piece similar to [[wikipedia:Twelve_Microtonal_Etudes_for_Electronic_Music_Media|Easley Blackwood's 12 Etudes]] or [https://aaronandrewhunt.bandcamp.com/album/the-equal-tempered-keyboard Aaron Andrew Hunt's Equal-Tempered Keyboard], an "album" experimenting with a range of different EDO systems.


At some point I plan to make a piece similar to [[wikipedia:Twelve_Microtonal_Etudes_for_Electronic_Music_Media|Easley Blackwood's 12 Etudes]] or [https://aaronandrewhunt.bandcamp.com/album/the-equal-tempered-keyboard Aaron Andrew Hunt's Equal-Tempered Keyboard], an "album" experimenting with a range of different EDO systems.
(Just wrote a 20-second piano intro in [[14edo|14-EDO]]--I think I've been thinking about it wrong this whole time!)


'''[https://akahler.w3spaces.com/ I have a website!!]'''
'''[https://akahler.w3spaces.com/ I have a website!!]'''
Line 12: Line 12:


==An idea for notation I had ==
==An idea for notation I had ==
Something I noticed in [[Ups and downs notation|regular EDO notation]], relying on Pythagorean names with an extra layer of accidentals, is that the Pythagorean major third in a lot of EDO systems doesn't match the [[5/4|just major third 5/4]]. So, with some thought from Just Intonation notations, I came up with something that I think might be promising.
Something I noticed in [[Ups and downs notation|regular EDO notation]], relying on [[Pythagorean]] names with an extra layer of accidentals, is that the [[81/64|Pythagorean major third]] in a lot of EDO systems doesn't match the [[5/4|just major third 5/4]]. So, with some thought from Just Intonation notations, I came up with something that I think might be promising.


In essence, instead of solely relying on Pythagorean names and arrows for edosteps in between (which can get unwieldy in larger EDOs, e.g. [[72edo#Intervals|72-EDO]]), I considered giving the [[syntonic comma]] priority. If your EDO has a different pitch for the just major third and the Pythagorean major third, then of course, it has a syntonic comma that hasn't been tempered out. This won't change anything for EDOs with a syntonic comma less than or equal to one step, of course, but it could have an effect on even "sharper" systems like 37-EDO.
In essence, instead of solely relying on Pythagorean names and arrows for edosteps in between (which can get unwieldy in larger EDOs, e.g. [[72edo#Intervals|72-EDO]]), I considered giving the [[syntonic comma]] a single symbol instead. That way you can emphasize the [[5-limit]] in your compositions more easily, and it will stay that way when directly read in a different EDO.


The syntonic comma can be represented by a sort of slash-like symbol Bosanquet used in his notation.
If your EDO has a different pitch for the just major third and the Pythagorean major third, then of course, it has a syntonic comma that hasn't been tempered out. This won't change much notation-wise for EDOs with a syntonic comma of 0 or 1 step, of course, but it could have an effect on even "sharper" systems like 37-EDO with a larger comma.


Single edosteps are still notated with arrows: '''^''' and '''v'''.
The syntonic comma can be represented by slashes: '''/''' and '''\'''. Single edosteps are still notated with arrows: '''^''' and '''v'''.


Here's a full example in [[37edo|37-EDO]]:
Here's a full example in [[37edo|37-EDO]]:
Line 217: Line 217:
|D
|D
|}
|}
For systems with a negative syntonic comma (most often in anti-diatonic and 7''n''-EDO systems) use ''')''' and '''(''' instead of '''/''' and '''\''', using <u>harmonic notation</u>.
For systems with a negative syntonic comma (most often in sub-meantone systems), use ''')''' and '''(''' instead of '''/''' and '''\'''.
 
Use <u>harmonic notation</u> for anti-diatonic systems.


An example in [[13edo|13-EDO]]:
An example in [[13edo|13-EDO]]:
Line 296: Line 298:
|D
|D
|}
|}
''I have also devised custom accidentals for quarter tones in both diatonic and anti-diatonic systems, but the image uploading process is being weird so I'll have to figure that out at some point.''
For systems with describable quarter tones, you can optionally use quarter tone notation. Though for many systems ([[24edo|24]], [[31edo|31]]), the syntonic comma notation makes it redundant; perhaps it could be of use in larger systems like [[41edo|41]], [[48edo|48]], or [[72edo|72]].


== Cloudy scales==
== Cloudy scales==

Revision as of 14:30, 24 May 2023

Hello! My name is Andrew and I like screwing around with xenharmony, especially notation.

At some point I plan to make a piece similar to Easley Blackwood's 12 Etudes or Aaron Andrew Hunt's Equal-Tempered Keyboard, an "album" experimenting with a range of different EDO systems.

(Just wrote a 20-second piano intro in 14-EDO--I think I've been thinking about it wrong this whole time!)

I have a website!!

I also exist on the XA Discord, currently under the alias Sir Semiflat.

Keep in mind that I have constantly been making changes to this page, so I could have made a lot of mistakes here.

An idea for notation I had

Something I noticed in regular EDO notation, relying on Pythagorean names with an extra layer of accidentals, is that the Pythagorean major third in a lot of EDO systems doesn't match the just major third 5/4. So, with some thought from Just Intonation notations, I came up with something that I think might be promising.

In essence, instead of solely relying on Pythagorean names and arrows for edosteps in between (which can get unwieldy in larger EDOs, e.g. 72-EDO), I considered giving the syntonic comma a single symbol instead. That way you can emphasize the 5-limit in your compositions more easily, and it will stay that way when directly read in a different EDO.

If your EDO has a different pitch for the just major third and the Pythagorean major third, then of course, it has a syntonic comma that hasn't been tempered out. This won't change much notation-wise for EDOs with a syntonic comma of 0 or 1 step, of course, but it could have an effect on even "sharper" systems like 37-EDO with a larger comma.

The syntonic comma can be represented by slashes: / and \. Single edosteps are still notated with arrows: ^ and v.

Here's a full example in 37-EDO:

Steps Pythagorean notation Old notation New notation
0 D D D
1 Eb Eb Eb
2 Fb ^Eb /D
3 Gbb ^^Eb /Eb
4 Bx vvD# \D#
5 Cx vD# \E
6 D# D# D#
7 E E E
8 F F F
9 Gb Gb Gb
10 Abb ^Gb /F
11 Bbbb ^^Gb /Gb
12 Dx vvF# \F#
13 E# vF# \G
14 F# F# F#
15 G G G
16 Ab Ab Ab
17 Bbb ^Ab /G
18 Cbb ^^Ab /Ab
19 Ex vvG# \G#
20 Fx vG# \A
21 G# G# G#
22 A A A
23 Bb Bb Bb
24 Cb ^Bb /A
25 Dbb ^^Bb \Bb
26 F#x vvA# \A#
27 Gx vA# \B
28 A# A# A#
29 B B B
30 C C C
31 Db Db Db
32 Ebb ^Db /C
33 Fbb ^^Db /Db
34 Ax vvC# \C#
35 B# vC# \D
36 C# C# C#
37 D D D

For systems with a negative syntonic comma (most often in sub-meantone systems), use ) and ( instead of / and \.

Use harmonic notation for anti-diatonic systems.

An example in 13-EDO:

Steps Pythagorean/old notation 26-EDO Subset New notation
0 D D D
1 E Dx, Ebb E, )C
2 Eb E Eb, )D
3 Fx Ex, Fb )E, (F
4 F# F# F#, (G
5 F Gb F, (A
6 G G# G, (B
7 A Ab A, )F
8 B A# B, )G
9 Bb Bb Bb, )A
10 Cx B# )B, (C
11 C# C C#, (D
12 C Cx, Dbb C, (E
13 D D D

For systems with describable quarter tones, you can optionally use quarter tone notation. Though for many systems (24, 31), the syntonic comma notation makes it redundant; perhaps it could be of use in larger systems like 41, 48, or 72.

Cloudy scales

I don't know about you, but I love the seventh harmonic. These MOS scales are named after the cloudy comma, and use different 7-limit intervals for generators.

Cumulus Alpha

Cumulus Alpha is a 5L6s MOS with 7/4 as the generator and 2/1 as the period. This appears to approximate a subset of 26-EDO; it approximates the whole of 26-EDO when extended to a 5L21s MOS, which I dub Cumulus Alpha Holo.

That's right. We're comparing JI to EDOs instead of the other way around.

Steps Ratio Cents Approx. 26-EDO Degree
0 1/1 0.000 0
1 16807/16384 43.130 1
2 8/7 231.174 5
3 2401/2048 275.304 6
4 64/49 462.348 10
5 343/256 506.478 11
6 512/343 693.522 15
7 49/32 737.652 16
8 4096/2401 924.696 20
9 7/4 968.826 21
10 32768/16807 1155.870 25
11 2/1 1200.000 26

Cumulus Beta

Cumulus Beta is an 4L5s MOS with 7/6 as the generator and 2/1 as the period. Amazingly, it approximates all intervals of 9-EDO within a cent, with a mean difference of about 0.409 cents.

Steps Ratio Cents 9-EDO Difference
0 1/1 0.000 0.000
1 2592/2401 132.516 -0.817
2 7/6 266.871 0.204
3 432/343 399.387 -0.613
4 49/36 533.742 0.409
5 72/49 666.258 -0.409
6 343/216 800.613 0.613
7 12/7 933.129 -0.204
8 2401/1296 1067.484 0.817
9 7/4 1200.000 0.000

Cumulus Gamma

Cumulus Gamma is an 3L8s MOS with 9/7 as the generator and 2/1 as the period. It approximates all intervals of 11-EDO within 7 cents, with a mean difference of 3.199 cents.

Steps Ratio Cents 11-EDO Difference
0 1/1 0.000 0.000
1 729/686 105.252 3.839
2 67228/59049 224.580 -6.398
3 98/81 329.832 -2.559
4 9/7 435.084 1.280
5 6561/4802 540.336 5.119
6 9604/6561 659.664 -5.119
7 14/9 764.916 -1.280
8 81/49 870.168 2.559
9 59049/33614 975.420 6.398
10 1372/729 1094.748 -3.839
11 2/1 1200.000 0.000