Complexity: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →Complexity measures: fix broken link |
Rework. This word can't be assumed to be said wrt temperaments |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In tuning, '''complexity''' | In tuning, '''complexity''' can be said with respect to individual [[interval]]s, [[chord]]s, [[scale]]s as well as the entire [[tuning system]]. While mathematically rigorous measurements of complexity are not available for all contexts and purposes, some of them have been extensively studied, including those of [[regular temperament]]s and of just or tempered [[interval]]s. | ||
{{Wikipedia| Complexity }} | |||
== Complexity of a temperament == | |||
Being a characteristic of [[temperament]]s, complexity can be used to evaluate and compare them. Generally speaking, if a temperament has high complexity, that means that interesting pitches (e.g. ones [[consonant]] with each other) are many [[generator]]s apart, so useful scales tend to have many notes. If a temperament has low complexity, fewer generators are required, and scales with fewer notes are more likely to be useful. | |||
Complexity and [[error]] are both usually treated as undesirable characteristics, but there is a trade-off between them in that very low complexity temperaments (e.g. small [[EDO]]s) cannot have low error, and very low error temperaments (e.g. [[microtemperament]]s or [[JI]] itself) cannot have low complexity. [[Badness]] is a way to combine complexity and error such that a search for low-badness temperaments yields results with a particularly good trade-off between complexity and error. | Complexity and [[error]] are both usually treated as undesirable characteristics, but there is a trade-off between them in that very low complexity temperaments (e.g. small [[EDO]]s) cannot have low error, and very low error temperaments (e.g. [[microtemperament]]s or [[JI]] itself) cannot have low complexity. [[Badness]] is a way to combine complexity and error such that a search for low-badness temperaments yields results with a particularly good trade-off between complexity and error. | ||
==Complexity of an interval in a temperament== | == Complexity of an interval in a temperament == | ||
Besides saying that a temperament has a high or low complexity, we also speak of the '''complexity of an interval''' in a temperament. If an interval has a low complexity in a certain temperament, that means it can be reached in only a few [[generators]], so it is likely to appear frequently in scales of that temperament. For example, in [[meantone]] temperament, the generator represents 3/2, so clearly 3/2 has a very low complexity, since it can be reached in only one generator. In contrast, 45/32 can only be reached in 6 generators so it has a higher complexity and will tend to appear much less frequently in meantone scales. | Besides saying that a temperament has a high or low complexity, we also speak of the '''complexity of an interval''' in a temperament. If an interval has a low complexity in a certain temperament, that means it can be reached in only a few [[generators]], so it is likely to appear frequently in scales of that temperament. For example, in [[meantone]] temperament, the generator represents 3/2, so clearly 3/2 has a very low complexity, since it can be reached in only one generator. In contrast, 45/32 can only be reached in 6 generators so it has a higher complexity and will tend to appear much less frequently in meantone scales. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 15: | ||
Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 temperaments]], but temperaments of any rank. For rank >2 temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up. | Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to [[rank-2 temperaments]], but temperaments of any rank. For rank >2 temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up. | ||
==Complexity measures== | == Complexity measures == | ||
Some specific, mathematically rigorous definitions of "complexity" are... | Some specific, mathematically rigorous definitions of "complexity" are... | ||
| Line 19: | Line 24: | ||
* [[Benedetti height]]</li></ul> | * [[Benedetti height]]</li></ul> | ||
[[Category:Complexity| ]] <!-- main article --> | |||
[[Category: | |||
Revision as of 08:17, 31 December 2022
In tuning, complexity can be said with respect to individual intervals, chords, scales as well as the entire tuning system. While mathematically rigorous measurements of complexity are not available for all contexts and purposes, some of them have been extensively studied, including those of regular temperaments and of just or tempered intervals.
Complexity of a temperament
Being a characteristic of temperaments, complexity can be used to evaluate and compare them. Generally speaking, if a temperament has high complexity, that means that interesting pitches (e.g. ones consonant with each other) are many generators apart, so useful scales tend to have many notes. If a temperament has low complexity, fewer generators are required, and scales with fewer notes are more likely to be useful.
Complexity and error are both usually treated as undesirable characteristics, but there is a trade-off between them in that very low complexity temperaments (e.g. small EDOs) cannot have low error, and very low error temperaments (e.g. microtemperaments or JI itself) cannot have low complexity. Badness is a way to combine complexity and error such that a search for low-badness temperaments yields results with a particularly good trade-off between complexity and error.
Complexity of an interval in a temperament
Besides saying that a temperament has a high or low complexity, we also speak of the complexity of an interval in a temperament. If an interval has a low complexity in a certain temperament, that means it can be reached in only a few generators, so it is likely to appear frequently in scales of that temperament. For example, in meantone temperament, the generator represents 3/2, so clearly 3/2 has a very low complexity, since it can be reached in only one generator. In contrast, 45/32 can only be reached in 6 generators so it has a higher complexity and will tend to appear much less frequently in meantone scales.
The complexity of a chord likewise refers to the number of generator steps required to generate all the pitches of the chord.
Note that the concept of complexity applies not only to rank-2 temperaments, but temperaments of any rank. For rank >2 temperaments, the lattice is a higher-dimensional space so there could be different ways of measuring the area/volume/etc. that a chord takes up.
Complexity measures
Some specific, mathematically rigorous definitions of "complexity" are...