Talk:TAMNAMS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "== Mosoctave? == If you're going with x-step names ''(which I don't really see catching on due to notation being ordinal, but that's a different subject)'', why still use the..." |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If you're going with x-step names ''(which I don't really see catching on due to notation being ordinal, but that's a different subject)'', why still use the octave name (8-ave)? The ditave is available, very descriptive, and independent of the "8th". --[[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 15:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC) | If you're going with x-step names ''(which I don't really see catching on due to notation being ordinal, but that's a different subject)'', why still use the octave name (8-ave)? The ditave is available, very descriptive, and independent of the "8th". --[[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 15:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
What do you mean by "notation being ordinal"? Music notation is visual and doesn't have a direct effect on that language. We used "octave" because the idea of octave as 2/1 is so ingrained that it shouldn't cause any confusion. "Ditave" is harder to say and doesn't clarify anything despite being conceptually nicer. --[[User:SupahstarSaga|SupahstarSaga]] ([[User talk:SupahstarSaga|talk]]) |
Revision as of 16:08, 12 June 2021
Mosoctave?
If you're going with x-step names (which I don't really see catching on due to notation being ordinal, but that's a different subject), why still use the octave name (8-ave)? The ditave is available, very descriptive, and independent of the "8th". --Ayceman (talk) 15:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
What do you mean by "notation being ordinal"? Music notation is visual and doesn't have a direct effect on that language. We used "octave" because the idea of octave as 2/1 is so ingrained that it shouldn't cause any confusion. "Ditave" is harder to say and doesn't clarify anything despite being conceptually nicer. --SupahstarSaga (talk)