Talk:MOS naming: Difference between revisions
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::: Thinking in terms of potential translations to other languages, and economizing on the syllables, maybe ''real/true'', ''general'', or just use ''gen'' itself as a word. | ::: Thinking in terms of potential translations to other languages, and economizing on the syllables, maybe ''real/true'', ''general'', or just use ''gen'' itself as a word. | ||
::: On &/@ - that may be so, but so are +/- and Unicode support for stylizing inline text isn't coming anytime soon. I would strongly suggest A+/B- or */` (A*/`B). [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 18:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | ::: On &/@ - that may be so, but so are +/- and Unicode support for stylizing inline text isn't coming anytime soon. I would strongly suggest A+/B- or */` (A*/`B). [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 18:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: I'll add that the prefixes should probably stay, as they could be used for the traditional harmonic system (#/b/maj/min/aug/dim/perf), maybe call that THARMS [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 19:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | |||