Direct approximation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
Hopefully made the relationship between a patent interval and a direct mapping more clear |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''patent interval''' | A '''patent interval''' in a given [[EDO]] is the number of EDO steps needed to reach the best approximation of a given interval in that EDO, and as such, it is also called a '''direct mapping'''. It is calculated by [[rounding]] the product of the [[Wikipedia: binary logarithm|binary logarithm]] (''log2'') of the interval ratio (''r'') and the EDO number (''nEdo''). | ||
round(log2(r)*nEdo) | round(log2(r)*nEdo) | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|} | |} | ||
A [[patent val]] is the best mapping of a representative set of intervals (taken to be [[generator]]s for a [[JI subgroup]]) in a given | A [[patent val]] is the best mapping of a representative set of intervals (taken to be [[generator]]s for a [[JI subgroup]]) in a given EDO; for the ''p''-[[prime limit]] this set consists of [[prime interval]]s. | ||
[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] | ||
[[Category:Method]] | [[Category:Method]] | ||
[[Category:Val]] | [[Category:Val]] |
Revision as of 23:53, 18 January 2021
A patent interval in a given EDO is the number of EDO steps needed to reach the best approximation of a given interval in that EDO, and as such, it is also called a direct mapping. It is calculated by rounding the product of the binary logarithm (log2) of the interval ratio (r) and the EDO number (nEdo).
round(log2(r)*nEdo)
- Some Examples
\ | 12edo | 17edo | 19edo | 26edo |
---|---|---|---|---|
3/2 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 15 |
5/4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
6/5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
7/4 | 10 | 14 | 15 | 21 |
A patent val is the best mapping of a representative set of intervals (taken to be generators for a JI subgroup) in a given EDO; for the p-prime limit this set consists of prime intervals.