Talk:72edo: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

Has anyone an idea if such tables make sense at all? Also a hint about sensible criteria what to take in what to leave out would be helpful. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

: I do in fact think that comma tables make sense, but I'd recommend choosing individual commas based on ~~both~~ their size, significance, and ~~JI subgroup~~. For example, commas with p-limits above 31 should not be included at all- the numbers that result from such primes get too complicated too easily. At the same time, commas that are of significant size relative to the EDO's Step size should also be included on the list. Commas like the Nexus comma should also be included on these lists due to their significance- it's not often that two pure prime chains get so close to one another that the difference between them is unnoticeable. I hope I'm being at least somewhat reasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

: I do in fact think that comma tables make sense, but I'd recommend choosing individual commas based on their size, their significance, and their p-limit. For example, commas with p-limits above 31 should not be included at all- the numbers that result from such primes get too complicated too easily. At the same time, commas that are of significant size relative to the EDO's Step size should also be included on the list. Commas like the Nexus comma should also be included on these lists due to their significance- it's not often that two pure prime chains get so close to one another that the difference between them is unnoticeable. I hope I'm being at least somewhat reasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:50, 21 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:52, 21 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Has anyone an idea if such tables make sense at all? Also a hint about sensible criteria what to take in what to leave out would be helpful. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 18:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)		Has anyone an idea if such tables make sense at all? Also a hint about sensible criteria what to take in what to leave out would be helpful. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 18:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

	: I do in fact think that comma tables make sense, but I'd recommend choosing individual commas based on ~~both~~ their size, significance, and ~~JI subgroup~~. For example, commas with p-limits above 31 should not be included at all- the numbers that result from such primes get too complicated too easily. At the same time, commas that are of significant size relative to the EDO's Step size should also be included on the list. Commas like the Nexus comma should also be included on these lists due to their significance- it's not often that two pure prime chains get so close to one another that the difference between them is unnoticeable. I hope I'm being at least somewhat reasonable. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)		: I do in fact think that comma tables make sense, but I'd recommend choosing individual commas based on their size, their significance, and their p-limit. For example, commas with p-limits above 31 should not be included at all- the numbers that result from such primes get too complicated too easily. At the same time, commas that are of significant size relative to the EDO's Step size should also be included on the list. Commas like the Nexus comma should also be included on these lists due to their significance- it's not often that two pure prime chains get so close to one another that the difference between them is unnoticeable. I hope I'm being at least somewhat reasonable. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)