Template talk:Infobox interval: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:02, 7 November 2020 view source Arseniiv (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 330 edits →Auto-applying a category?: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:15, 7 November 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Auto-applying a category?: re Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Should this template also insert e. g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Interval]]</nowiki></code> into page text, is it a good idea? --[[User:Arseniiv\|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv\|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)		Should this template also insert e. g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Interval]]</nowiki></code> into page text, is it a good idea? --[[User:Arseniiv\|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv\|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

			: Yes, in principle, but I'm not clear what the best category (or categories) should be. We have so far mostly: Interval, Interval ratio, Ratio, I also think that the prime limit could (better: should) be added to the parameters: it's applicable in every case and never goes beyond the limits (as monzos do sometimes see 71-limit). --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 18:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)