|
|
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
| |
|
| Automated archiving would be nice, but not essential in the first place. | | Automated archiving would be nice, but not essential in the first place. |
|
| |
| == <code>Template:Stub</code> ==
| |
|
| |
| I hope that would be found useful to automatically categorize pages as needing attention (maybe even different kinds of attention?), as well as marking the places needing elaboration. For example, right on this page until it’s “production ready” ;-) I’ll investigate later if I’m up to the task to desigh a nice-looking template but if you know how to do it easily, please feel free to! --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 17:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Before thinking about an appropriate [[Template:Stub]], I think [[:Category:Todo]] is worth a look, as well as its sub categories, these category developed out of wikispaces tags and are maybe more specific then just ''stub''. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Oh, this is a treasure! But a visual rectangular reminder may still be useful? Let it be tunable to include the subcategory of Todo one wants to apply. How do you think? I’ll experiment with that in a subspace. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 18:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| The template with an example of how it looks: [[User:Arseniiv/TodoTest]]. It seems to apply the category correctly. Maybe that can find some use still, but if not, no problem. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 19:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == See also == | | == See also == |