Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 20:57, 5 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:10, 5 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	: I'm glad you like the idea of the darts being universally usable- I mean, they are nothing more than better versions of the glyphs of ups and downs notation after all... As for the distance between the double darts being two small, that really depends on the height of the triple dart glyphs, as the triple dart glyphs should have the same height as a natural accidental. However, you are absolutely right about the rounded edges of the glyphs, those really do need fixing... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)		: I'm glad you like the idea of the darts being universally usable- I mean, they are nothing more than better versions of the glyphs of ups and downs notation after all... As for the distance between the double darts being two small, that really depends on the height of the triple dart glyphs, as the triple dart glyphs should have the same height as a natural accidental. However, you are absolutely right about the rounded edges of the glyphs, those really do need fixing... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

			: One more thing... the angle of the darts is something that should be decided by Kite, as he's the one who first came up with Ups and Downs notation, and besides, he would need to know about the stylistic upgrade anyway. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)