Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions
→Dart symbol(s): new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I like the idea of universal usability indicating some edo step or double step. The graphical symbols themselves are the least sophisticated glyphs I made, IOW they are still more like a ''sketch''. Maybe the distance between the double darts is a bit too small. Also the angle isn't carefully designed as are the "rounded" edge parts. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC) | I like the idea of universal usability indicating some edo step or double step. The graphical symbols themselves are the least sophisticated glyphs I made, IOW they are still more like a ''sketch''. Maybe the distance between the double darts is a bit too small. Also the angle isn't carefully designed as are the "rounded" edge parts. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I'm glad you like the idea of the darts being universally usable- I mean, they are nothing more than better versions of the glyphs of ups and downs notation after all... As for the distance between the double darts being two small, that really depends on the height of the triple dart glyphs, as the triple dart glyphs should have the same height as a standard accidental. However, you are absolutely right about the rounded edges of the glyphs, those really do need fixing... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC) | |||