Talk:Mason Green's New Common Practice Notation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:41, 2 May 2019 view source Mike Battaglia (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, Sysops 1,399 edits →Changes to the article ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:41, 2 May 2019 view source Mike Battaglia (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, Sysops 1,399 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 227:		Line 227:
	--[[User:Bozu\|Bozu]] ([[User talk:Bozu\|talk]]) 12:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)		--[[User:Bozu\|Bozu]] ([[User talk:Bozu\|talk]]) 12:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

	: Bozu, as a quick note, I would say this should be moved to "Mason Green's 19-EDO notation," or whatever, and then this page should be edited however you see fit. I ~~also think~~ there are some issues with the notation - having the augmented second be "bIII," for instance, totally breaks the pattern in 19-EDO... [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia\|talk]]) 16:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)		: Bozu, as a quick note, I would say this should be moved to "Mason Green's 19-EDO notation," or whatever, and then this page should be edited however you see fit. I share your view there are some issues with the existing notation as written - having the augmented second be "bIII," for instance, totally breaks the pattern in 19-EDO... [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia\|talk]]) 16:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)