Talk:Gallery of just intervals: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:11, 20 July 2026 view source PrySigneToFexia (talk \| contribs) 21 edits →336/317: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:11, 20 July 2026 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,728 edits →336/317: Re Newer edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	-- [[User:PrySigneToFexia\|PrySigneToFexia]] at 17:11 2026.7.20 Mon (CST) ([[User_talk:PrySigneToFexia\|talk with me]])		-- [[User:PrySigneToFexia\|PrySigneToFexia]] at 17:11 2026.7.20 Mon (CST) ([[User_talk:PrySigneToFexia\|talk with me]])

			: It seems quite complex to me (especially with 317 being prime), and there are many intervals close to 100¢ with a similar level of complexity or less, such as [[18/17]] (very simple, 1¢ flat), 107/101 (two smaller primes, 0,1¢ flat), etc. In other words, the name "12-edo step under just intonation" could be attributed to many intervals, and I probably wouldn't choose 336/317 if I have to choose one. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 21:10, 20 July 2026 (UTC)