Talk:Pythrabian comma: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Okay, I definitely think that comma deserves to be treated like both the Pythagorean and Alpharabian commas in that it should have a distinct common name from which we can derive temperament names. However, I'm not sure which common name we should use for this. I think we'll have to brainstorm at some point. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | : Okay, I definitely think that comma deserves to be treated like both the Pythagorean and Alpharabian commas in that it should have a distinct common name from which we can derive temperament names. However, I'm not sure which common name we should use for this. I think we'll have to brainstorm at some point. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: In that case, I've proposed ''undecapyth comma'' / ''undecapythma'', following the pattern of ''tridecapyth comma''. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 30 April 2026
Type of the name
Should we treat Pythrabian as a special comma name like Pythagorean/Alpharabian comma and give it a distinct common name to derive temp names, or also as a common name, which means it can use the second declension (pythrabia – pythrabic – pythrabian – pythrabian comma)? —FloraC (talk) 09:04, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
- Okay, I definitely think that comma deserves to be treated like both the Pythagorean and Alpharabian commas in that it should have a distinct common name from which we can derive temperament names. However, I'm not sure which common name we should use for this. I think we'll have to brainstorm at some point. --Aura (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)