Talk:Pythrabian comma: Difference between revisions
Created page with "== Type of the name == Should we treat ''Pythrabian'' as a special comma name like ''Pythagorean''/''Alpharabian comma'' and give it a distinct common name to derive temp names, or also as a common name, which means it can use the second declension (pythrabia – pythrabic – pythrabian – pythrabian comma)? —~~~~" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Type of the name == | == Type of the name == | ||
Should we treat ''Pythrabian'' as a special comma name like ''Pythagorean''/''Alpharabian comma'' and give it a distinct common name to derive temp names, or also as a common name, which means it can use the second declension (pythrabia – pythrabic – pythrabian – pythrabian comma)? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:04, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | Should we treat ''Pythrabian'' as a special comma name like ''Pythagorean''/''Alpharabian comma'' and give it a distinct common name to derive temp names, or also as a common name, which means it can use the second declension (pythrabia – pythrabic – pythrabian – pythrabian comma)? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:04, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
: Okay, I definitely think that comma deserves to be treated like both the Pythagorean and Alpharabian commas in that it should have a distinct common name from which we can derive temperament names. However, I'm not sure which common name we should use for this. I think we'll have to brainstorm at some point. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC) | |||