Ternary scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 264: Line 264:
For 5.1.1: We showed previously that the Fraenkel, odd-regular, and even-regular circular words are balanced.
For 5.1.1: We showed previously that the Fraenkel, odd-regular, and even-regular circular words are balanced.


We will first prove that a balanced circular word is primitive iff rhe gcd of the step signature is 1. Proof sketch: let ''d'' be the gcd of the step signature. (''n''/''d'')-step multisets come in 1 size, namely the equave divided by ''d'', because if some letter count differs, then we get 3 values for this letter count for (''n''/''d'')-step multisets by the discrete IVT.
We will first prove that a balanced circular word is primitive iff the gcd of the step signature is 1. Proof sketch: let ''d'' be the gcd of the step signature. (''n''/''d'')-step multisets come in 1 size, namely the equave divided by ''d'', because if some letter count differs, then we get 3 values for this letter count for (''n''/''d'')-step multisets by the discrete IVT.


It remains to show that (a) ternary balanced words are pairwise-MOS (b) if ''a'' > ''b'' > ''c'', then ''s'' is equivalent to the Fraenkel word (c) assuming ''a'' != ''b'' = ''c'' any ''s'' that is not odd-regular or even-regular is not balanced.
It remains to show that (a) ternary balanced words are pairwise-MOS (b) if ''a'' > ''b'' > ''c'', then ''s'' is equivalent to the Fraenkel word (c) assuming ''a'' != ''b'' = ''c'' any ''s'' that is not odd-regular or even-regular is not balanced.