Talk:57edo: Difference between revisions
Maybe future column of additional ratios of 9, 15, or 25 tending sharp? |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: . . . Although come to think of it, it might not be a bad idea to add an extra column eventually of additional ratios of 9, 15, or 25 tending sharp (seems to me that the 3rd and 5th harmonics aren't close enough to the midpoint to warrant sharp 3rd or 5th harmonics, when so many of the next higher harmonics are pretty close to just). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 14:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC) | : . . . Although come to think of it, it might not be a bad idea to add an extra column eventually of additional ratios of 9, 15, or 25 tending sharp (seems to me that the 3rd and 5th harmonics aren't close enough to the midpoint to warrant sharp 3rd or 5th harmonics, when so many of the next higher harmonics are pretty close to just). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 14:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: When you left out 3/2 and 4/3 I thought you intended it to be a dual-3 dual-5, so I edited to formalize it that way, tho I figured the 5-limit part from 19edo would also make sense. That's why I was asking. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC) | |||