Talk:Porcupine family: Difference between revisions
→"Sharp of 8d-edo"?: new section |
|||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
== "Sharp of 8d-edo"? == | == "Sharp of 8d-edo"? == | ||
While I get that the order of sharpness here refers to the 3/2, I don't get why. 3/2 isn't especially important to porcupine. I mean sure, it's a consonance, but it's -3 generators. | While I get that the order of sharpness here refers to the 3/2, I don't get why. 3/2 isn't especially important to porcupine. I mean sure, it's a consonance, but it's -3 generators. | ||
I think it makes more sense to talk about how sharp a tuning is based on the sharpness of the generator, rather than the sharpness of -3 of them, so I'd call opossum (generator around 160c) flatter than porky (generator around 164c), rather than sharper. | I think it makes more sense to talk about how sharp a tuning is based on the sharpness of the generator, rather than the sharpness of -3 of them, so I'd call opossum (generator around 160c) flatter than porky (generator around 164c), rather than sharper. | ||
: Makes sense, tho I think it's best to follow ploidacot specs. Since porcupine is omega-tricot it's prolly best to base the sharpness of tunings on 4/3 (and thus the ~11/10 generator) rather than 3/2. In most cases however, 3/2 should be preferred over 4/3. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC) | |||