Talk:Porcupine family: Difference between revisions
→"Sharp of 8d-edo"?: new section |
|||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
::: Just to be clear, we're not renaming core negri itself to negrifowl, right? Only one of its extensions? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 08:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC) | ::: Just to be clear, we're not renaming core negri itself to negrifowl, right? Only one of its extensions? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 08:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
== "Sharp of 8d-edo"? == | |||
While I get that the order of sharpness here refers to the 3/2, I don't get why. 3/2 isn't especially important to porcupine. I mean sure, it's a consonance, but it's -3 generators. | |||
I think it makes more sense to talk about how sharp a tuning is based on the sharpness of the generator, rather than the sharpness of -3 of them, so I'd call opossum (generator around 160c) flatter than porky (generator around 164c), rather than sharper. | |||