Talk:Porcupine family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
::::::::::: Let me tell you again. 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine is ''right there'' and no one's saying you shouldn't use it. But meanwhile 7-limit JI is as musically relevant as the 2.3.5.11 subgroup if not more, and one gets septimal porcupine and meantone simply by tempering 7-limit JI. Your assessment of likelihood is biased, possibly becuz you have little experience with JI. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC) | ::::::::::: Let me tell you again. 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine is ''right there'' and no one's saying you shouldn't use it. But meanwhile 7-limit JI is as musically relevant as the 2.3.5.11 subgroup if not more, and one gets septimal porcupine and meantone simply by tempering 7-limit JI. Your assessment of likelihood is biased, possibly becuz you have little experience with JI. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::: But we're talking about porcupine, not JI. We're documenting this temp as a coherent structure. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 19:49, 19 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Rename of tridecimal porcupine == | == Rename of tridecimal porcupine == | ||