Talk:Porcupine extensions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Decanonize tridecimal porcupine: new section |
Re |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Decanonize tridecimal porcupine == | == Decanonize tridecimal porcupine == | ||
Leriendil believes the current "tridecimal porcupine" should be decanonized in favor of porcupinefish, because tridecimal porcupine's mapping isn't even ''porky's'' best mapping of 13, let alone septimal porcupine's. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 20:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
: I disagree. Negri is extended the same way as tridecimal porcupine so there's a pattern. | |||
: Porky is irrelevant for how undecimal porcupine should be extended. | |||
: I'll sort this out with Leri. | |||
: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:00, 16 May 2025
Decanonize tridecimal porcupine
Leriendil believes the current "tridecimal porcupine" should be decanonized in favor of porcupinefish, because tridecimal porcupine's mapping isn't even porky's best mapping of 13, let alone septimal porcupine's. -- VectorGraphics (talk) 20:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree. Negri is extended the same way as tridecimal porcupine so there's a pattern.
- Porky is irrelevant for how undecimal porcupine should be extended.
- I'll sort this out with Leri.