Talk:Porcupine family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Re |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine ("porkypine") ''is'' a canonical extension, so is 7- and 11-limit porcupine. Since porcupine is a full 11-limit temp, there's no reason to pick the subgroups within it instead of simply going 5-, 7-, and 11-limit. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC) | : 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine ("porkypine") ''is'' a canonical extension, so is 7- and 11-limit porcupine. Since porcupine is a full 11-limit temp, there's no reason to pick the subgroups within it instead of simply going 5-, 7-, and 11-limit. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
:: Sure, but like, it makes no musical sense to restrict porcupine to 2.3.5.7. Does 7 somehow have some inherent priority over 11? --[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 20:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:08, 10 May 2025
But porkypine is the canonical extension?
I see no reason why the page should not start with 2.3.5, then go to 2.3.5.11, and then proceed to extensions to 7 and 13.
- 2.3.5.11-subgroup porcupine ("porkypine") is a canonical extension, so is 7- and 11-limit porcupine. Since porcupine is a full 11-limit temp, there's no reason to pick the subgroups within it instead of simply going 5-, 7-, and 11-limit. FloraC (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, but like, it makes no musical sense to restrict porcupine to 2.3.5.7. Does 7 somehow have some inherent priority over 11? --VectorGraphics (talk) 20:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)