Talk:Tempered monzos and vals: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
+: Agree. Battaglia and co have a habit of making a page titled one thing and then making that page about something completely different. (See the history of the radical interval page for another example. ---[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 23:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
-Agree. Battaglia and co have a habit of making a page titled one thing and then making that page about something completely different. (See the history of the radical interval page for another example. ---[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 23:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
+: Care to explain in which way this is inconsistent with ''Mathematical theory of regular temperaments''? In that page a temp is defined as
+: > A regular temperament is a homomorphism that maps an abelian group of target/pure intervals to another abelian group of tempered intervals.
+: which seems to say the same thing as the first sentence of what you cited. The second sentence seems to just be saying there's infinitely many eqivalent matrices that represent the same temp.
+: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)