Talk:FKH Extended-diatonic Interval Names: Difference between revisions
m Lériendil moved page Talk:On the naming of musical intervals to Talk:FKH Extended-diatonic Interval Names without leaving a redirect: page content moved over to that other page |
Dual harmonic values? |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please, move this to your section in [[Interval summary]]. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[Editor PiotrGrochowski|info]], [[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/PiotrGrochowski|contribs]]) 07:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC) | Please, move this to your section in [[Interval summary]]. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[Editor PiotrGrochowski|info]], [[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/PiotrGrochowski|contribs]]) 07:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
: I disagree, I think in this form it can be kept here. It's a complete essay. Maybe it should be linked from there. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC) | : I disagree, I think in this form it can be kept here. It's a complete essay. Maybe it should be linked from there. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
== Dual harmonic values == | |||
What should we do for naming intervals when a tuning has dual values for a harmonic (most obviously but not limited to dual fifth)? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC) | |||